Видео

Jannes and jambres opposed Moses... 2 Timothy 3;8

*If you ask the Lord in your prayer, You will know the will of God to only eat clean foods. We must have will to follow the will of God . It's not Law of Moses actually, its the Law from God.

thanks guys I appreciate the connection on the Sabbath god bless

What are the characteristics of a god and who taught you about it??? Start there buddy.

"Can you explain why gods are never proven to exist?" Yes!!!!! They don't exist...... Well, wasn't that easy!!!

it is proven. it is rare becasuse people aren't humble nor honest. theya re fascists and death worshippers.

"Is that a loaded question" Was his first reaction. No, it's just that you knew you didn't have a good response the second after you heard the question. Argumentum Ad Populum is not a valid response, it's just a logical fallacy, a complete failure of logic and an invalid argument. Not 100% proven? Not even 1% proven, you're filling the complete lack of proof in with faith.

Yes I can. Gods cannot be proven to exist because they are not real. All of them are the invention of men.

The Abrahamic stories are so incredibly stupid. Nothing about them makes sense if you think about them at all. They might make a little bit more sense if the god character was a bumbling fool god who couldn't see the future and wasn't very bright.

Your argument that 2.2 billion people believe it so it's true is not a good argument. I can say on the other hand 5.8 billion people reject Christianity so if 5.8 billion can agree on rejecting Christianity, then Christianity Can't be true. It's a bad argument no matter who makes it

It is very very simple! Man made god(s) they exist only in what a person chooses to believe! For what ever reason! They are nothing more than an extension of human imagination! Thus mannwrote the bible, therefore man created god! What are the parameters? Of here is some parameters, to prove to me your God exists!1. Show me the evidence without using anybwritten word what so ever 2. Ask me zero questions, just show the proof! If yoi can't do that, and you can't, you can't prove yoir God exists, it only exists in the book you got it from! That's it! It is nothing more than an idea! You have your parameters, now prove it!

im sorry but there is no other proposition that exists where we would say "were not 100% certain, so i'll use faith to fill in that gap". not a single other proposition. its just a lighter way of saying "we cant prove it, but i'll grant it anyway". or essentially a god of the gaps fallacy. and i'd say that the question "is there a god?" is one of the most important questions that could be answered. but i would definitely not use this line of reasoning if my life was on the betting table for any proposition.

What a master class in back pedaling. Proof, which is the only hallmark of Truth is determined by evidence that is verifiable, demonstrable and repeatable. It is difficult to determine what level of evidence must be verified to prove a god, but at this point in time, ZERO valid evidence exists for the existence of supernatural god(s). the volume of evidence that points to the existence of god(s) is identical to the volume of evidence that points to the existence of unicorns, garden fairies, mermaids and the monster that lives in my closet. Proof is not a popularity contest, based on the opinions of the populous. At one time in the past, 95 percent of the population believed that the Sun was in orbit around the Earth, but their opinions did not reflect the truth, that the Earth is in orbit around the Sun. Your Christopher Columbus example was a story believed by the majority, but it is not a story of truth. A belief in god(s), or any other supernatural deities, entities, or phenomenon can only be created through faith. Faith is the mechanism that people use to build a belief when there is no foundation of evidence to build a belief upon. Once verifiable, demonstrable and repeatable evidence exist for a belief, then faith is no longer required to support that belief. Faith should never be admired, rewarded, or promoted for any purpose. It is true, that nothing is absolute and no claim can be confirmed, or dismissed with 100 percent certainty. The majority of atheists are agnostic to remain open to the possibility of god(s), unicorns and fairies, but until the evidence for such claims is provided, nobody has any right to build such a belief and certainly no right to make such a claim. Since the very beginnings of mankind, every god that they imagined and claimed to have evidence for, the evidence was found to be invalid and not evidence at all. Millions of actions and events that were previously attributed to god(s) in the past, when investigated and solved by science, were NEVER found to be god(s).

This guy goes off into a downward spiral and an aimless tangent all at the same time….this is exhibit A of what you get when people are deeply programmed and brainwashed by their religion

The guy is taking the long route to saying he hasn't a clue 🙂

Matt Dillahunty has the best answer to the question of evidence. He says that he does not know what would be evidence, but if a god exists, he absolutely would know. The silence on the subject would indicate that either the god does not exist, or she does not want her existence known. Either way, it is not Matt's problem. People can believe something for bad reasons. In twenty-some years The Atheist Experience has not had a single caller that they could not shoot down. Maybe god is not sending his best and brightest, but I cannot fathom why that should be so! All you believers out there, you have my pity. Have a nice day.

If a god exists and if god thinks it's morally good to force people and other life forms into the type of existence where they will suffer against their will and the type of existence that they might hate existing in, then that's just gods subjective opinion that I highly disagree with. It would be much better if no life forms existed at all because then no life forms would be victims of existing and suffering against their will in any way. And if no life forms existed then that would be just fine because then no life form would know or care that they didn't exist. It is evil to force someone into the type of existence where they will suffer against their will and it is evil to force someone into the type of existence that they might hate to exist in.

To save anybody the trouble of listening to a long winded and convoluted answer. He comprehensively fails to prove Gods exist.....surprise surprise!!

Yeah about those billions of Christians... I'm black. And my people believe in the Bible cuz white Christians used the Bible to justify enslaving and colonizing black people. And then forced them to become Christians. How did it happen for ya'll?

God = Fantasy 💩

Christians, don't talk about science. You embarrass yourselves every time

There is so much wrong with what he says... If we ignore all the mistakes and fallacies he makes, we can sum it up to _"we don't really know whether God exists, we have no good evidence that God exists, but we just ignore that and pretend that he exists"_

I got this.. Gods are never proven to exist because that's the way they are designed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ What good would a God be if someone claimed that there was a God in every 12 oz can of Coca Cola? Everyone would empty a Coke and the Cola God religion would be over. No book sales, no passing the plate, no kids to diddle, no holidays! So, Faith was invented. It's virtue, everyone knows that. Gods were first placed on mountain tops, in volcanos, in Heaven, and now it's outside space-time. That's unfortunate but if you want to believe you know things that you don't actually know... just believe it. Do you want to live forever or not??? Not being able to verify your god isn't a problem... it's a feature.

Wow i see more atheist comments and I like it. Go critical thinking and skepticism.

I do not have time to listen to the complete answer. It starts out very weak, and I bet it will go downhill from there. If any god was ever proven to exist, we would all (at least the somewhat rational of us) be convinced that god exists. So instead of coming up with excuses, a better answer would be "Here is the evidence and here is the scientific study that has been conducted, peer reviewed and has passed scrutiny".

I god am so loving that I forced people and other life forms into the type of existence where they will suffer against their will. I god am so loving that I forced people into the type of existence that they might hate existing in.

I god forced adam and eve into existence and I created them in a flawed and fallible way which caused them to make mistakes, mistakes that I knew that they would make before I even created them. And now I'm going to blame and punish them and all of their offspring for unfortunately being victims of being the flawed and fallible way that I created them, as if it's their fault that I created them that way.

2+2 is proven to be 4

3:21 but are you 100% certain that there's never 100% certainty with regard to anything in life.

Yes. Because they don't. The simple answer is probably the best one.

in my reality a handshake would really help...

Because REAL truth lies within one's heart 😊❤

Why is it that religious people can never just simply answer a question, but endless word salad.

You're using "faith" in two different ways and conflating them. You're using it as both a synonym for trust and spiritual conviction. The 'trust' way would mean that you have confidence that when you turn the key in your car's ignition it will start because you have historical evidence and data, Even if it doesn't start you could read the manual and investigate the problem in a reliable, testable, and repeatable way. The other way would be the same as believing that when you turn the ignition the car will begin to fly on the power of wishful thinking and good intentions. One is trust because of the evidence, the other is belief in spite of the evidence.

'What we believe is going to be truth.' That's the problem with using faith instead of facts to form your beliefs.

(2:30)It means 1/3 (your number not mine) of the world doesn't think critically. (2:50)Because faith is gullibility packaged as a virtue. (4:40) Only gullible people rely on faith for these things, most of these mentioned have plenty of evidence to support the claims. (5:10) Just because an idea is popular does not mean it is true. (5:30) Cool, now show me how you know what the bible says is true. (8:55) He won't force me, but from what I've been told by christians he'll just send me to hell. (9:10) I don't think they're stupid, just misguided or afraid. (10:05) That's not how evolution works. (11:45) I'm not an astrophysicist, but clearly, neither are you. (13:25) I'm an atheist and I believe in helping people too, I didn't need a god to tell me that it was a good thing to do. (13:45) I argue about this because you guys are so pervasive that most of our lawmakers are also christian, and they make laws based on their religions that affect me and people of other religions who don't believe the same things as them. (14:05) I have no evidence that suggests that there is a "next step". (14:40) I asked god the same thing and he didn't, so what does that mean? (16:05) How do you have a relationship with someone you can't see, hear, or have conversations with? (16:45) Does your husband know that you think the relationship you have with his is equal to the one you have with the imaginary man in the sky?

"Is that a loaded question?" Time to squirm Mr.Grifter...

Because they do not exist.

There is no god but God

Umm, perhaps because they're made up 🤷

What a dissemblance. There are currently a plurality of people who believe the Christian god is correct. It is likely that by 2050 believe Allah is God and Christians are wrong. Two different gods. When Muslims surpass Christians will you accept your god is wrong. ?

You say that you’re not stupid but then you repeat a Kent Hovind line. 😂😂 Seriously, get your fucking science information from real scientist😂😂

There are so many problems with the arguments and reasoning in this video. Lots of fallacious arguments too.

A bunch of flawed arguments, no offence. I don't know what would be the sufficient evidence of the existence of a god, but I don't need to know it. Because if an all loving, all knowing and all powerful god wants me to be convinced, he or she will give me the evidence. In any other case, I don't have responsibility in the matter. The fact that 2.2 billion people identify as Christian, is completely irrelevant. Let's forget the fact that is doesn't mean 2.2 billion believers, that's not important. What's important is that the overwhelming majority of these people never required evidence. I never met a believer who had strong evidence, and never met any who's faith was based on evidence. It is a bit of an oxymoron anyway, because if you have evidence, you don't need faith. And what do you mean they tested their theory? How did they exactly test it? Regarding evolution, no, we weren't there when single cellular life became multicellular, that became human etc. The evidence is overwhelming. You are just trying to drag us down to your level and force that we also believe, but it is simply just not true. Not to mention the fact that even if evolution was disproven today, it would in no way prove the existence of a god. I know it's irrelevant here, so this is just a footnote to the end. So yeah guys, do better because this is a bit thin.

Such a horrible attempt at just saying - it's a fairytale.

If it took god doing something special for you to understand, why on earth would you expect different for anyone else? It sounds like it is up to god. So Im not religious because god has not shown me the light. so if I go to hell, its not me it's god. Nice job guys, you explained god as a monster. God basically creates some people for destruction. why? why does god create babies for destruction for example? I don't see this god in the same way you do, so im trying to understand. Certainly god drown babies in the great flood, babies that had been born only minutes before drowning. whats the purpose of creating those babies for destruction? I feel like you all never think past your own greed for heaven etc. It's rather obvious this all loving god of the bible does not exist.

Just because 2.2 billion people believe it doesn't mean they don't have the burden of proof. This video is a load of nonsense and fallacies. Think clearer. Do better.

There is a great deal of equivocation over the meaning of "prove" in this video. The standard model of particle physics isn't proven in the way that a deductive syllogism proves its consequent. But the standard model of particle physics is the most robust explanation, with fewest metaphysical committments, to explain the huge amounts of data observed. As a result, the standard model of particle physics is a useful model for understanding the world around us. I cannot think of any a priori deductive theological proofs that tell us more about the world around us than the science which these creators suggest is so flawed.

god cant ve proved by science cant be disproved by science he only can only feel or proved logically

I love all the tap dancing around the question to start, rather than just answering the question directly. Sure, a preponderance of evidence which would satisfy the condition of proof beyond reasonable doubt would be nice. The fact that 2.1 million people identify as Christian in no way demonstrates proof of anything. It is not evidence of anything other than the power of gullibility. That just means 2.1 million people simply take it on faith that their god exists DESPITE not being able to demonstrate the truth of that claim beyond a reasonable doubt. This guy is hilarious. Evolving from "slime" and "no one was there to see it." The ol' goo to zoo to you trope, huh?! 😂 And, no, JWST did not break the Big Bang model. And, no, the Big Bang is not the origin of the universe. AND, NO, you DO NOT have to take things on faith. Any reasonable person should not do that. You are correct that you probably can't know things with 100% certainty, but you can and should use supporting evidence to help make decisions and conclusions. Faith is a terrible reason to believe something is true.